<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Evolution of Design: How 10 Popular Sites Looked 10 Years Ago</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailydesignmag.com/the-evolution-of-design-how-10-popular-sites-looked-10-years-ago/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailydesignmag.com/the-evolution-of-design-how-10-popular-sites-looked-10-years-ago/</link>
	<description>Your Daily Dose of the Latest Design News and Trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:22:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydesignmag.com/the-evolution-of-design-how-10-popular-sites-looked-10-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydesignmag.com/?p=156#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Pretty awesome idea, should do a Part 2 of this :)

Also, Wikipedia have redesigned their site; it&#039;s only open to Beta users. Looks awesome now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty awesome idea, should do a Part 2 of this <img src='http://www.dailydesignmag.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Also, Wikipedia have redesigned their site; it&#8217;s only open to Beta users. Looks awesome now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydesignmag.com/the-evolution-of-design-how-10-popular-sites-looked-10-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydesignmag.com/?p=156#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Yeah it&#039;s funny to look back and see how dramatically websites have changed over the years. 

We wrote a similar article a while ago but looked at the way websites were like in 1996 :)
http://www.bfinternet.co.uk/news-info/articles/the-web-in-1996</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah it&#8217;s funny to look back and see how dramatically websites have changed over the years. </p>
<p>We wrote a similar article a while ago but looked at the way websites were like in 1996 <img src='http://www.dailydesignmag.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
<a href="http://www.bfinternet.co.uk/news-info/articles/the-web-in-1996" rel="nofollow">http://www.bfinternet.co.uk/news-info/articles/the-web-in-1996</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Design Ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydesignmag.com/the-evolution-of-design-how-10-popular-sites-looked-10-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Design Ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydesignmag.com/?p=156#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Thanks for memories :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for memories <img src='http://www.dailydesignmag.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim H</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydesignmag.com/the-evolution-of-design-how-10-popular-sites-looked-10-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydesignmag.com/?p=156#comment-170</guid>
		<description>Can anyone say thank god?  I still cry a little bit inside whenever I see sites that still look like these.  We have definitely come a long way, although some of them, unfortunately, haven&#039;t changed much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone say thank god?  I still cry a little bit inside whenever I see sites that still look like these.  We have definitely come a long way, although some of them, unfortunately, haven&#8217;t changed much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 80+ Awesome Community Links for Designers and Developers &#124; Master Design</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydesignmag.com/the-evolution-of-design-how-10-popular-sites-looked-10-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>80+ Awesome Community Links for Designers and Developers &#124; Master Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydesignmag.com/?p=156#comment-168</guid>
		<description>[...] The Evolution of Design: How 10 Popular Sites Looked 10 Years Ago [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Evolution of Design: How 10 Popular Sites Looked 10 Years Ago [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydesignmag.com/the-evolution-of-design-how-10-popular-sites-looked-10-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>David H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydesignmag.com/?p=156#comment-167</guid>
		<description>The Apple site looks terrible. This list lost all credibility at no 8 IMO. You revealed yourself as an Apple fanboi, who will never find anything wrong with Apple! Tell the truth, it&#039;s a crap design, even for &#039;97.

Amazon&#039;s site is amazing, easily head &amp; shoulders above the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Apple site looks terrible. This list lost all credibility at no 8 IMO. You revealed yourself as an Apple fanboi, who will never find anything wrong with Apple! Tell the truth, it&#8217;s a crap design, even for &#8216;97.</p>
<p>Amazon&#8217;s site is amazing, easily head &amp; shoulders above the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Litherland</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydesignmag.com/the-evolution-of-design-how-10-popular-sites-looked-10-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Litherland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydesignmag.com/?p=156#comment-165</guid>
		<description>lol, we&#039;d all be on a few million a year if we&#039;d started out there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, we&#8217;d all be on a few million a year if we&#8217;d started out there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 80+ Awesome Community Links for Designers and Developers &#124; Programming Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydesignmag.com/the-evolution-of-design-how-10-popular-sites-looked-10-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>80+ Awesome Community Links for Designers and Developers &#124; Programming Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydesignmag.com/?p=156#comment-163</guid>
		<description>[...] The Evolution of Design: How 10 Popular Sites Looked 10 Years Ago [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Evolution of Design: How 10 Popular Sites Looked 10 Years Ago [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 80+ Awesome Community Links for Designers and Developers&#160;&#124;&#160;tripwire magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydesignmag.com/the-evolution-of-design-how-10-popular-sites-looked-10-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>80+ Awesome Community Links for Designers and Developers&#160;&#124;&#160;tripwire magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydesignmag.com/?p=156#comment-162</guid>
		<description>[...] The Evolution of Design: How 10 Popular Sites Looked 10 Years Ago [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Evolution of Design: How 10 Popular Sites Looked 10 Years Ago [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bilal Ç?narl?</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydesignmag.com/the-evolution-of-design-how-10-popular-sites-looked-10-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilal Ç?narl?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydesignmag.com/?p=156#comment-161</guid>
		<description>It seems Amazon has a timeless web design. Amazon still using the similar design as in 10 years ago with small enhancements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems Amazon has a timeless web design. Amazon still using the similar design as in 10 years ago with small enhancements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
